Posts by Aimee Custis
|Aimee Custis is a policy wonk by training and a communicator by profession. She is the managing editor of Greater Greater Washington and the Communications Manager at the Coalition for Smarter Growth. Weekends, you'll find her at home in Dupont Circle or practicing her other love, wedding photography.|
Friday is the DC region's 15th annual Bike to Work Day. It's a great opportunity to build a few extra minutes into your commute to stop at one of the nearly-80 commuting "pit stops" on your way to work.
The pit stops offer refreshments, raffles, and free t-shirts to those who register. Each pit stop has something a little different: elected officials and entertainment will be at some, and some will be open in the afternoon for your commute home.
Last year's Bike to Work Day in our region attracted over 14,000 participants. Will you be joining this year? If so, don't forget to snap a photo or two and add them to our Flickr pool.
This week, we learned that Phase II of the Silver Line is now 13 months behind schedule. We asked our contributors what they thought about this, a major delay to the region's largest transit expansion. What's the deal?
Adam Lind pointed out this delay is likely for the best, long-term:
From what I understand, the 13 months of delay are for all the additional stormwater management that they are volunteering to do, to meet regulations under the new stormwater requirements. While this may cause delay in the short term, it is probably better for the long term impact of the project to the environment.
Matt Johnson drew some connections between the Silver Line delay and infrastruture building as a whole:
Everybody wants something out of the planning process. We all want different things, though. For decades, basically, motorists said, "we want wider roads", and by and large they got it. But now, things have changed. People want other things, too. We want bike lanes. And bus lanes. And transit funding. And sidewalks. And streetscape improvements.Edward Russell isn't very surprised about the delay, though he agrees that,
And that's all great. But the environmental community also wants things. One of those things is on-site stormwater retention. Much of this is due to the extreme width of our roads because of decades of widenings to accommodate ever more motor vehicles.
And so when someone says, "we need a new bike lane," the environmental community says, rightly, "that increases the impervious surface. We need to deal with that." But if we insist that it be dealt with on-site, it often means wider roads with wide medians or wide swales that make the road feel wider, which causes drivers to go faster. And makes pedestrians feel smaller, especially when having to cross these roadways. And bus stops have a swale between them and the sidewalk.
Everyone wants a share of the pie. But if the size of the pie is fixed, that means that we have to fight over how large everyone's slice is. The bikes want a slice of the pie. And so do transit users. And pedestrians want a slice of the pie, too. And the environmentalists want a slice. And motorists want six slices.
We have to deal with the environmental consequences of our transportation decisions. Virginia has decided to do that with their new regulations. And it is affecting this project. Maybe you think that's the wrong approach. Maybe you think the environmental community's slice is getting too big at the expense of the Silver Line. But that's irrelevant. Virginia has decided, and it affects the project. Decisions have consequences.
However, MWAA has clearly known about this for months. Why is the public only finding out about it now?
...it would have been nice if MWAA had notified the public sooner to the possibility of a delay. I always considered the 2018 opening date a bit ambitious but hoped it would happen.Dan Malouff also agrees:
Compared to the delays we've see with the DC Streetcar and what they see in New York (the LIRR East Side Access project is about a decade behind schedule), I think the Silver Line delay is minimal.
This sucks, but it happens with complex projects sometimes. It's a sign that officials need to pay attention and make sure things move as smoothly as possible from here out, but it's not necessarily a sign that we need to panic or that there's anything seriously wrong with the project overall.Payton Chung chimed in to express the thoughts of several contributors:
I always take opening dates on large infrastructure projects with a grain of salt—What do you think about the delays? Par for the course, or reason for concern? Tell us in the comments!
consider the numerous delays to the original Silver Line, for instance. It eventually happened, of course, and it's doing great.
What might be happening here is that the perfect is becoming the enemy of the good—
a relatively straightforward project is seeing its scope balloon to encompass a bunch of other worthy but perhaps unrelated goals, like stormwater management. This scope expansion partially explains why American transit projects cost so much more than those elsewhere.
It's sad that we have come to expect that transit construction projects in America will always be behind schedule and over budget, but that's just the way things are these days.
The City of Alexandria might not follow through on plans to add 16 new Capital Bikeshare stations throughout the city this year. But if it does, city staff have identified the general areas the new stations are likely to go.
Capital Bikeshare stations overlaid on crowdsourced demand map (Click to enlarge). Map by the author from City of Alexandria data.
City staff presented the expansion information at the Alexandria's transportation commission's December. (The overlay map above reflects a slightly updated set of locations I received after reaching out to the city this week.)
The locations are based on the city's public crowdsourcing maps, connectivity to transit, proximity to mixed-use activity centers, and whether the location was within .25 mile of an existing station.
Technical considerations like direct sunlight to power the stations, adequate space, flat ground, and utility clearances will be important in choosing the exact site for each station.
The new stations would be primarily to the east, in Old Town, Del Ray, Potomac Yard, and surrounding areas. But three new stations would add to the cluster in Fairlington, and Eisenhower East will recieve a new station as well. Though there's definitely a demand for stations in West End, activity centers, density, and a lack of nearby stations could make it harder for stations in those areas to be successful.
What else do you notice about the locations?
Data fans, rejoice. Now you can see for yourself which Metro stations generate the most farebox revenue when, thanks to a new interactive data visualization released today by PlanItMetro.
As you'd expect for a system that serves as many commuters as Metrorail, terminal stations dominate in terms of revenue contribution in the morning, and core stations dominate during evening rush.
Union Station functions as an internal terminal station, since commuter rail and Amtrak connections to Metro are extremely important to the overall ridership and revenue picture.
What other patterns do you notice?
Get outside and grab some exercise with these great events, or if you're feeling a little less active, mark your calendar for Metrobus meetings. Still too much for you? Take an online survey to give your feedback!
New modes in New Carrollton: New Carrollton as a vibrant, multimodal hub? New Purple Line connections, pedestrian and bike-friendly development, and state of the art planning are all in the works to make that a reality. Join the Coalition for Smarter Growth's walking tour to get your learning and exercise out of the way for the weekend.
After the jump: Bicycle counts, bike to work, the future of Columbia Pike, Metrobus meetings, and more...
Talk water with the White House: Early risers, join Samantha Medlock of the White House Council on Environmental Quality and other experts over breakfast to talk about the future of water infrastructure policy in the US. The breakfast is hosted by the American Planning Association. Breakfast is free, as long as you register.
Metrobus meetings and survey: WMATA and DDOT are studying how to improve service on the 60, 62, 63, and 64 bus lines, which are some of DC's most heavily-used routes. They are seeking public input via an online survey and public meetings on Wednesday, April 15 (5:30-7:30 pm at Petworth Library) and Saturday, April 18 (12:30-2:30 pm at Takoma Community Center). The study will wrap up in late 2015.
What is "Tactical Urbanism"? There's still time to sign up for our free book talk with Tactical Urbanism co-author Mike Lydon at 6:30 pm on April 21 in Brookland. We're co-sponsoring the talk with Coalition for Smarter Growth, CNU-DC, and Island Press, so be sure to mark your calendar and snag a space before they're all gone!
Future of Columbia Pike: With the cancellation of the Columbia Pike Streetcar, what's next for the corridor? Listen to and ask questions of a panel of community leaders about the future of Columbia Pike on April 30 starting at 6:00pm. The Columbia Pike Revitalization Organization is hosting the event at the Salsa Room on Columbia Pike. Space is limited, so be sure to get the full details and RSVP.
Bicycle counts: How many cyclists ride in Alexandria? Advocates count just that 2-3 times per year, and this time, they're looking for volunteers to help! The Alexandria Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) is conducting counts on Thursday, May 7 (5-7 pm) and Saturday, May 9 (12-2 pm). If you can help, be sure to sign up for an assignment!
Bike to Work Day: On Friday, May 15, join over 10,000 area commuters for this year's Bike to Work Day. Be sure to register (it's free) to get your free t-shirt. 79 pit stops throughout DC, Maryland, and Virginia will host refreshments and raffles.
Do you know of an upcoming event that may be interesting, relevant, or important to Greater Greater Washington readers? Send it to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
People carry a lot of weird stuff on Metro. We asked our contributors what they've seen, and what Metro's rules are for carrying unusual items.
We started in on the topic when contributor Ned Russell asked what the policy for skis on Metro is during our discussion on best projects from other places, adding, "I contemplated taking them on for a flight to Colorado earlier this winter but ended up just getting a ride."
Fellow contributor Nick Keenan had the answer:
You can bring your skis, your surfboard, your washing machine—
if it fits it rides.
But the answer isn't quite that simple. Gray Kimbrough pointed out that in response to video footage of a mattress on Metro, last year, WMATA issued clarifying policy language:
Patrons may carry ordinary hand baggage and instrument cases, tool cases, folding baby carriages, wheelchairs, bundles, or packages which can be handled without inconvenience to other patrons. Such articles must not be permitted to remain in a position where they will interfere with entrance or exit, free use of the aisle, or the proper and safe operation of the vehicle. Patrons must remain with their possessions at all times. Unattended articles may be confiscated and/or destroyed for safety and security reasons.Naturally, we devolved in a discussion of the craziest things you've ever seen on Metro.
David Cranor and Nick Keenan point us back to a washing machine, though whether or not it's Metro is up for debate.
Julie Lawson confesses, "I've taken my surfboard on Metro during rush hour. I also, a looooong time ago, took a life-size inflated emperor penguin on during evening rush. It sat on my lap. Not nearly as large as a washing machine but possibly more ridiculous-looking."
Home appliances... but no bikes?
"Metro has stringent regulations on bicycles but none on other large and bulky items," says Nick Keenan. "Your bicycle, even if it's in a cardboard shipping container, is restricted. Boxes of bicycle parts, on the other hand, are no problem."
Steve Seelig points out that this is a "huge gap in Metro policy with the rush hour bike ban. Seriously, I would ditch my car if I could use the system [with my bike] during rush hour. Rumor has it Metro is having ridership issues, and I recall last year one of their spokespeople mentioned they are trying to lure more cyclists onto the system. But he just meant the people, not the bikes."
What's the craziest thing you've ever seen on Metro? Tell us in the comments!
Do you have a question? Each week, we'll post a question to the Greater Greater Washington contributors and post appropriate parts of the discussion. You can suggest questions by emailing email@example.com. Questions about factual topics are most likely to be chosen. Thanks!
As the weather is warming up, there's plenty more to do around the region than soak up the sun at a sidewalk cafe. (Though, you should do that too.) Mark your calendar for great activities around the region this week and beyond.
Affordability with APA: Talk affordable housing for Montgomery County Tuesday 4/7 (tomorrow) at 5:30 pm with Praj Kasbekar of the Montgomery Housing Partnership. The event is part of the American Planning Association's "Tuesdays at APA" series at 1030 15th St NW.
After the jump: Tactical Urbanism, federal transportation policy, and more.
Tactical Urbanism: Spaces are filling up fast for our free book talk with Tactical Urbanism co-author Mike Lydon at 6:30 pm on April 21 in Brookland. We're co-sponsoring the talk with Coalition for Smarter Growth, CNU-DC, and Island Press, so be sure to mark your calendar and snag a space before they're all gone!
Federal transportation reauthorization: Talk about the upcoming reauthorization of the federal MAP-21 transportation program over wine and cheese at the American Public Transportation Association's Transportation Tuesday series, Tuesday 4/7 (tomorrow) at 5:00 pm. Hear from keynote guest Governor Jim Gilmore, President & CEO of the Free Congress Foundation (FCF). RSVP requested to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Potomac Yard Metro: Alexandrians awaiting the infill Potomac Yard Metro station can rejoice: the next step is here! Last week, officials released the draft environmental impact statement for four alternative locations being considered. Public comment on the alternatives is open through May 18, so why not weigh in Wednesday, April 8 at 6:30 pm at the latest public meeting?
Purple Line in the legislature: At this month's ACT meeting on April 14, join Maryland Delegate David Moon (District 20) for a briefing on the latest about the Purple Line as this year's Maryland legislative session comes to an end. ACT meetings are the second Tuesday of the month at the Silver Spring Civic Center, beginning at 7:30 pm.
Do you know of an upcoming event that may be interesting, relevant, or important to Greater Greater Washington readers? Send it to us at email@example.com.
A letter sent earlier this week is reviving the debate over whether Northern Virginia should build the ten-mile, four-lane Bi-County Parkway.
The Bi-County Parkway is the latest incarnation of what some have called an "Outer Beltway," which highway boosters have been pushing for decades. The proposed north-south highway comes with a $440 million price tag to link Loudoun and Prince William counties west of Dulles Airport.
Delegate Tim Hugo, who represents Virginia's 40th district where the project would largely be built, asked the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to clarify its position on the long-studied highway.
In response, VDOT officials dispatched a letter saying that for the time being, VDOT has suspended negotiations seeking National Park Service approval of the highway route through the Manassas National Battlefield Park, and that it has put a hold on completing the necessary environmental studies to move forward with the project.
"VDOT is not actively working on the project including pursuing the Programmatic Agreement or the environmental approvals from the Federal Highway Administration," the letter said.
Local support for the highway is waning
In response to the letter, Delegate Hugo and several other state and local elected officials gathered yesterday to announce it's time to kill the project for good, demonstrating the growing opposition to the project from elected officials and their constituents.
Smart growth advocates, who oppose the highway, say that if built, the north-south route wouldn't solve northern Virginia's mainly east-west traffic problems.
But the highway would open over 100,000 acres of the Rural Crescent in Prince William County and of the Transition Area in Loudoun County to sprawl-style development, which would hurt the environment and put additional stress on already overburdened east-west roads like I-66 and Route 50 as commuters travel to jobs.
Next week, the Prince William County Board of Supervisors will introduce a resolution to remove the project from the county's comprehensive plan.
"This road, as we know it, is dead, or on life-support. And what we are saying is kill it totally, to remove the cloud that is hanging over all these constituents out here, all these citizens, homes, and churches," said Hugo. "The letter says they are not pursuing the programmatic agreement [with the National Park Service]. There is no way you build this road if they are not going to do it."
VDOT is keeping the project alive
While not pursuing an agreement with the National Park Service or completing the environmental studies at this time, the McAuliffe administration intends to evaluate the Bi-County Parkway through the project rating system outlined in legislation passed by last year's General Assembly, known as HB2.
The legislation requires that major transportation projects in the state be scored under a range of factors, to help determine which projects move forward. Those criteria are being developed, but are likely to be ready in June.
Smart growth advocates are working to offer input to those criteria, and are optimistic that the Bi-County Parkway will not score well in terms of congestion reduction, cost-effectiveness, or environmental impact. They are urging the Governor to simply cancel the project and direct transportation funds to the I-66 corridor, regional transit, and local road needs.
Thanks to all of you —
Almost 200 of us (according to our sign-in sheets), including several local elected officials and agency heads gathered last night at Lost & Found near the Convention Center for cake, drinks, and mingling.
If you weren't able to join us, we hope you enjoy these and the rest of the photos on our Facebook page. Also, you can join us at an upcoming Greater Greater happy hour. Thank you for being a part of our seven years (and counting) of success!
Last night, nearly 200 activists from across Maryland flooded the statehouse in Annapolis to remind legislators of broad popular support for the state's two transit projects, the Purple Line and Baltimore's Red Line.
Amid concerns that Governor Larry Hogan may cancel the projects, transit supporters from around the state attended over 50 meetings with delegates from Montgomery County, Prince George's County, Baltimore County, and Baltimore City. They also stirred up social media with the hashtag #transitnight.
An exceptionally diverse range of organizations, from the Board of Trade to the Sierra Club to University of Maryland students to CASA, an immigrant advocacy organization, organized and attended the event. Support from so many different walks of life makes sense given that the Purple Line will strengthen neighborhoods, improve connections to friends and family, and boost local economies all over.
Baltimore mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake was one of many elected, community, and business leaders to speak at the rally.
Organizers of the event hosted a rally after the evening's meetings, which nearly two dozen elected officials attended. Among them were Montgomery County Executive Ike Leggett, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Prince George's County Councilmembers Mel Franklin, Dannielle Glaros, and Deni Taveras, and Montgomery County Councilmembers George Leventhal and Roger Berliner.
Councilmember George Leventhal summed up the sentiment and hopes of the packed room when he said, "When we stand together like this, these projects cannot be killed."
Governor Hogan's transportation secretary Pete Rahn, who has come under scrutiny for having little transit experience, is currently reevaluating the Purple Line, and the Governor has said he will make a final decision about the project in mid-May.
- Beyond Metro, there's no big idea for transit in DC anymore
- Canceling the Purple Line would cost more than it would save
- Incomes are rising in the District, but not for people born here
- Maryland plans new station at BWI, and other projects to run more trains
- DC has an awesome city flag. Here’s why that matters
- Coast Guard employees are using the Anacostia Metro station in a weird way
- How well do you know Metro? It's whichWMATA week 52