Greater Greater Washington

Posts in category Public Spaces

Events roundup: Post-holiday fun

After a short holiday break, we are jumping right back into a busy week of fun-filled events. Learn about Buzzard Point, Montgomery County rapid transit, and President Obama's transportation funding strategy. See new apps and tools using Capital Bikeshare data, and learn how smart growth and environmental protection go hand-in-hand in Virginia.


Photo by Elvert Barnes on Flickr.

The future of Buzzard Point: This section of DC has started to change with the nearby baseball stadium and will change far more if a soccer stadium comes to the area. GGW contributor David Garber is moderating a panel discussion about Buzzard Point development Tuesday, December 2, 6:30 pm at 101 M Street SW.

Obama's transportation strategy: Nathaniel Loewentheil, Senior Policy Advisor at the White House National Economic Council, wil discuss the Obama administration's transportation funding strategy at a talk on Tuesday, December 2. It's at the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), 1666 K Street NW. A wine a cheese reception starts at 5 pm and the presentation and discussion will go from 5:30 to 6:30 pm.

Capital Bikeshare technology: Coders around the region have continued to build useful and fun apps and visualizations using Capital Bikeshare data. The third CaBi hack night is coming up on Thursday, December 4. People will show off their creations at the WeWork Wonder Bread Factory, 641 S Street NW starting at 6 pm.

Montgomery County rapid transit: If buses are more your flavor, then spend your Thursday night learning about the proposed bus rapid transit (BRT) line for Montgomery County. The Coalition for Smarter Growth and Communities for Transit will host an informational open house at the Activity Center at Bohrer Park, 7:30-8:30 pm, where you can get up to speed on the proposal for 10 major BRT routes to connect several communities in the County.

Greener smart growth: Interested in saving the environment while supporting smart growth? Join the Coalition for Smarter Growth and the MVCCA Environment and Recreation Committee to consider how smart growth can help support restoring the watershed around Route 1 in Fairfax County. Ecologist Danielle Wynne with Fairfax County will discuss the current restoration plans for the watershed and how we can balance growth and the future health of the environment. The event is on December 3 at the Mt. Vernon Government Center, 2511 Parkers Lane, from 7:15 to 8:30 pm.

Do you know of an upcoming event that may be interesting, relevant, or important to Greater Greater Washington readers? Send it to us at events@ggwash.org.

Greater Greater Washington relies on support from readers like you to keep the site running. Support us now keep the community going.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time

Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

Congress gives itself more free parking than its own rules allow

As TransitCenter and the Frontier Group reported last week, the federal government pays a huge $7.3 billion subsidy to people who drive to work by making commuter parking expenses tax exempt. There are countless reasons for Congress to scrap this poorly-conceived, congestion-inducing subsidy. While policymakers consider the big picture, they also ought to examine how their own parking benefits are administered.


How much are these free parking spots worth? More than the $250 per month in tax-free parking benefits that Congress allows. Photo by JMT.

Here's the short version: Congress is breaking its own law, and it's shorting the Treasury hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, by providing free parking far in excess of the allowable limits.

USC 26 Section 132f of the tax code allows employers to provide each worker with up to $250 in free parking per month tax-free, which can add up to $3,000 in tax-free perks per employee each year. That's a pretty big amount to pay people for exacerbating congestion, but the parking at the U.S. Capitol is worth significantly more than that.

It's hard to know exactly how many free parking spaces we're talking about. The Architect of the Capitol and relevant committees don't like to talk about it, but Lydia DePillis reported in the Washington City Paper a few years ago that a plan for the southern part of the Capitol complex completed in 2005 shows that the House office buildings alone have 5,772 parking spaces assigned to them.

To figure out the market value of those spots, it would help to be able to check the rates at adjacent private lots. The problem is: There are no adjacent private lots.

According to SpotHero, there are no available monthly parking spots within a mile of the Capitol. The closest oneabout a 20 minute walk to either the House side or the Senate sidecosts $270.


SpotHero shows how far a Senate employee would have to walkand how much she'd have to payfor a monthly parking spot near the Capitol. Image by SpotHero.

There are some cheaper options a little farther away, but the cost of parking more than a mile from the destination is almost inconsequential. Given the extreme scarcity of parking near the Capitol, which employs and attracts tens of thousands of people daily, you can bet that on-site parking is worth significantly more than faraway options. Moreover, if so many employees didn't get free parking on the Capitol grounds, how would that affect demand, and therefore parking rates, at surrounding lots?

According to the law, if an employee is provided with free parking in excess of the allowable limit, the difference should be reported as taxable income, and the employer would have to pay all the normal employment taxes (Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, etc.) on that portion.

IRS staff affirm that the value of any fringe benefit is based on the market. Congress can't just say the parking is worth $250 and call it a day. They have to acknowledge that the benefit they are providing to staff and members is worth the market price. In the case of a reserved parking space directly on the Capitol grounds, it is likely worth much more than the $270 per month established by the adjacent market for parking.


Streets, lots, and garages reserved for US Capitol personnel parking. Image by Streetsblog.

With this understanding, every staffer and member of Congress receiving free parking is not paying tax on at least $240 in annual compensationand that is a minimum estimate. Having seen staffers' pay stubs, I can verify that they are not paying the full value of the parking provided. The failure to report and tax this additional income easily costs the Treasury hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

The scandalous part is that this is a rule that Congress directly controls. If lawmakers wanted to have an even higher limit for free parking, they could debate it and pass an increase. But rather than address the issue, members of Congress simply break their own law.


The Ellipse, just south of the White House, is dedicated to free parking for federal employees. Image by SpotHero.

And it's not just Congress, of course. Most likely, many other federal, state, local, and private entities are guilty of non-compliance with the $250 limit on free, untaxed parking. In DC alone, there are huge swaths of land, like the Ellipse south of the White House, which serve only as free parking for federal employees. To my knowledge, no one is keeping track of the value of those spaces, or if employees with this benefit should be reporting additional income when it exceeds the limit.

If Congress would keep its own house in order in terms of reporting its taxable parking benefits, it could spark a larger conversation around whether this is a reasonable benefit to have in the first place. So long as the gravy train keeps rolling, and everyone both expects and receives free parking on Capitol Hill, we're missing an opportunity for meaningful reform of a tax subsidy that undermines the effectiveness of our national transportation policy.

This post originally appeared on Streetsblog

Greater Greater Washington relies on support from readers like you to keep the site running. Support us now keep the community going.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time

Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

To a pedestrian, a road's a tiny space with danger just beside

Pedestrians surrender a lot of public space to cars. It's something society has accepted, but this clever illustration from Claes Tingvall of the Swedish Road Administration shows how extreme our allocation of public space has become, from the pedestrian's point of view.

page/2

Greater Greater Washington relies on support from readers like you to keep the site running. Support us now keep the community going.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time

Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

DDOT director Brown stands up to opposition to mini-circles

Permanent traffic circles will go in at two intersections in American University Park despite a last-ditch effort by some residents to block them. Transportation chief Matt Brown personally got involved to keep the project going.


Photo by waltarrrrr on Flickr.

On Friday, November 14th, DDOT Traffic Systems Maintenance Manager James Cheeks asked American University, who had agreed to pay for the circles, to delay the construction until there could be another community meeting. Residents, who had already endured a number of meetings on this topic, were surprised at the sudden shift from DDOT at the eleventh hour.

But in an email Monday night, Director Matt Brown said DDOT had collected enough public input and heard enough discussion to move forward with the circles. Installation should start today.

Simply put, we believe that these mini-circles are an appropriate way to improve safety. That said, we will continue to work with American University, MPD, and you to monitor these locations after installation. DDOT will also reach out to neighbors near the southern mini-circle, where we have heard specific concerns about operations, to discuss how we've addressed those in the final design. We are committed to making these mini-circles valued elements of the community.

For these reasons, I am asking American University to proceed with construction. Once again thank you for contacting me with your comments and concerns. I know that this action will not please everyone, but I am confident that safety will be improved.

Why Cheeks asked American University to hold off or who asked for another hearing in the first place remains vague.

"The reason for the delay and how it came about is unclear," wrote Advisory Neighborhood Commission 3E commissioner Sam Serebin, who represents the area. "This project has certainly not suffered from too little process (anyone who suggests as much just hasn't been paying attention) and the ANC still supports the project."


The current, temporary circles.

One possibility, though, is 3E chair Matthew Frumin, who was the target of the opponents' petition. Though he himself supports the circles, Frumin a message to Cheeks, Brown, DDOT's Sam Zimbabwe, and Councilmember Mary Cheh at 3:15 pm on Friday afternoon asking for another community meeting. Cheeks' request for a delay came just three hours later. Meanwhile, Cheh's office reiterated her support for the circles.

In multiple emails to DDOT and councilmember Mary Cheh, other 3E commissioners made it clear that Frumin had taken his action without first discussing the issue with the entire commission.

Director Brown deserves praise for standing up for this project despite efforts to delay it further. There has been enough public input; city agencies need to decide when they've heard all of the substantive arguments about a project and then be willing to move forward. AU Park residents will enjoy safer streets because Brown took action.

Greater Greater Washington relies on support from readers like you to keep the site running. Support us now keep the community going.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time

Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

Veterans Day closures: No "commutemageddon," and even some perks for those not working

Though roads closed and the Blue Line stopped running on Veterans Day, crowding and waits for commuters weren't as bad as some had feared. For people who had the day off, the closures even created an impromptu "open streets" event on car-free avenues. But many details, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists, came as a surprise.


Car-free Independence Avenue. Photo by Joe in DC on Flickr.

The Concert for Valor did attract large crowds to the National Mall, but they were nowhere near the 800,000 people that concert organizers initially predicted. Immediately beforehand, they lowered the estimate to closer to 250,000.

"Our initial indications are everything went very smoothly," said National Park Service (NPS) spokesperson Mike Litterst. NPS was responsible for managing and coordinating road closures and security for the concert with other agencies.

Streets closed at 6 am for a 7 pm event

Thirteen hours before the concert began, all of the streets closed around the mall, including long stretches of Constitution and Independence Avenues and everything from 3rd to 17th Streets as far north as Pennsylvania Avenue and as far south as Maine Avenue. Commenters on our pre-Veterans Day post about the changes asked why the closures could not have begun after the morning rush.

"In general… closure time for the streets is a decision jointly made by all of the participating public safety and law enforcement agencies for safety and security reasons," said Litterst. "It allows the secure area to be properly and diligently swept and secured prior to the concertgoers entering. It is a security plan and process that has been refined over numerous large-scale events in and around the Mall over the years, including Independence Day, inaugurations, and large-scale races, such as the Marine Corps Marathon."

Cyclists, walkers, and joggers, however, enjoyed the car-free spaces. Throughout the day, photos and videos of people enjoying a nearly empty Constitution Avenue emerged.

"That was pretty fun. Let's close down Constitution more often," said Rob Pitingolo, who shot a video of the car-free boulevard.

But actually crossing the Mall was more difficult. Anyone entering the area between Jefferson and Madison Drives, 17th Street, and the Capitol had to pass through security checks, and those only opened at 10 am.

Metro served 40% more riders than last Veterans Day

Metrorail trains carried about 523,000 passengers on Veterans Day, says spokesperson Dan Stessel. Last year, when there was no large event, roughly 375,000 people rode Metro.

Personally, I noticed slightly more people than usual on my morning and evening commutes on Metro from Shaw to Braddock Road. Despite fewer trains and no Blue Line, my experience was better than on previous "minor" holidays when scheduled track work and crowded transfer stations made the inconveniences of reduced schedules even worse.


Light crowds on the Yellow Line heading into DC at Pentagon at about 5:30 pm. Photo by the author.

"From our perspective, the day went really well," said Stessel. "Service levels were appropriate to meet ridership demand at all hours of the day, and we believe we struck an appropriate balance between the needs of regular commuters with those heading to the Concert for Valor."

Greater Greater Washington readers asked why Metro didn't keep the Blue Line open until later in the day. Metro also banned bikes all day.

"No doubt, the service changes were in place to handle crowds that, in the end, were not as large as the Park Service permit," said Stessel. "We make no apologies for this. We have to plan for the worst and hope for the best."

What could be better next time?

Some of the details of the street closures and service changes got lost in the media blitz before the event. For example, NPS and the press could have more clearly communicated that Constitution and Independence Avenues would be free of cars and open to pedestrians and cyclists. Most news reports focused on the effect on drivers.

Also, NPS could work to minimize the impact on cyclists. While drivers could still use the 3rd Street (I-395) and 9th Street tunnels to cross the Mall, cyclists couldn't. They had to cross either east of 3rd or west of 17th. NPS could designate corridors, perhaps along one of the streets at the edge of the security cordon, for riders to cross the Mall. Many, myself included, would have taken advantage of these.

Greater Greater Washington relies on support from readers like you to keep the site running. Support us now keep the community going.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time

Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

Street trees can't ask for more soil themselves, but new DC standards will help them get it

Trees are a special quality of DC's urban environment, but the city's tree canopy has been shrinking in recent years. A new set of design standards ensures new construction on the roads and in public space includes enough soil so that trees can thrive.


Photo by Dewita Soeharjono on Flickr.

In April 2014, the District Department of Transportation released new green infrastructure design standards for its projects. A major goal is to capture rain directly where it falls rather than dumping it into sewers or rivers, which causes flooding, spreads pollution, taxes sewer systems, and wastes an increasingly valuable resource.

The standards push for green areas to retain stormwater in heavily-paved areas like sidewalks, plazas, and streets. With them, DC joined a growing group of cities like New York, Philadelphia, and Chicago that use "low-impact design" features to help restore ecological function to urban areas.

But the District is distinguishing itself by also requiring a minimum soil volume for street trees, which must now get 600 to 1,500 cubic feet of soil (depending on how large they can grow).

Trees play an important role in our lives

Many of us have fond memories linked to trees. Perhaps you had a favorite climbing spot as a kid or you planted one in the yard of the first house you bought. Maybe you regularly cool off in a tree's shade during a heat wave or have called the parks department when one was vandalized in your neighborhood.

People instinctively want to be around trees, which makes sense when you consider how good they are for human health. Trees make cities cleaner, more inviting, safer, and more profitable.

According to Casey Trees, a local nonprofit, DC's tree canopy currently covers 35 percent of its land, down from 50 percent in 1950. Advocates want to to turn that around and reach 40 percent by 2035. An increase of five percent may sound small, but to meet this goal the District will need to add more than 2,000 acres of tree canopyan estimated 216,000 trees.

It's not just about the number of trees. While trees are part of almost every DC street, mature urban trees are rare, meaning the city frequently loses out on the value and utility they bring to public spaces.

Mature trees are significantly more valuable than young ones to the ecosystem. A tree with a 30-inch trunk circumference delivers 70 times the air quality benefits of a tree with a 3-inch trunk. And mature trees "intercept," or prevent from hitting the ground, far more rainwater per year than young ones. That reduces the amount of stormwater that flows into sewers and rivers, which frequently causes flooding and carries pollutants. One model found a 40-year-old hackberry tree intercepted 5,387 gallons of rainfall per year while a 5-year-old one intercepted only 133 gallonsa 40-fold difference.

Soil is key to healthy trees

The long-term success of a tree is fundamentally linked to the quantity and quality of the soil it grows in. To make a real impact the District needs to not just plant trees, but give them the space and nutrients they need to grow to maturity. , soil retains rainwater directly where it falls, which is good because diverted rainwater leads to flooding, spreads pollution, taxes sewer systems, and wastes an increasingly valuable resource.

For context, the average street tree in a typical 4' x 4' space can have as little as 75 cubic feet of soil. This is less than one tenth of what experts recommend for long-term tree health. The new policy will guarantee space for roots, and coupled with proper care and maintenence, will enable trees to grow and thrive for decades to come.

There are an increasing number of ways to put soil below streets, parking lots, and plazas to give trees soil even in dense or pedestrian-heavy areas. For example, the new American Veterans Disabled for Life Memorial at Washington Avenue and 2nd and C streets SW, which my company worked on, suspends the pavement with soil cells, modular, stacking units that leave space for soil and roots for 30 trees.


Soil cells at the American Veterans Disabled for Life Memorial. Image from DeepRoot.

DC's renewed commitment to trees will pay off in the long term

These new green infrastructure standards arise from years of discussion, public comment, and pilot projects. "DDOT has attempted to change the culture of urban stormwater management by applying these standards to all capital improvement and private sector projects in the public space," said (former) DDOT Chief Engineer Ronaldo Nicholson in a press release in April about the new standards.

Residents might not notice all that much change immediately. After all, trees take years to grow and reach their potential. But our children will.

Greater Greater Washington relies on support from readers like you to keep the site running. Support us now keep the community going.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time

Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

Mini-circles calm traffic in AU Park but stir opposition

For a year now, drivers and cyclists on 42nd Street NW encountered a traffic calming device that's new to DC: Small traffic circles made out of plastic pylons. Permanent versions will soon replace them. But not all neighbors are pleased.

42nd Street is a popular route through American University Park. It offers a way to reach homes, schools, and a senior center without using busy Wisconsin Avenue. But drivers speed through the area and it was not safe enough for pedestrians, a 2011 study of the area found.

The solution? Mini-circles, a traffic calming device that's common in places such as Seattle, Portland, and Palo Alto, California. These provide a more pleasurable way to slow traffic than a speed bump. They are more effective than stop signs, since drivers may ignore a sign but must slow down to navigate the circle.


Photo by Seattle Department of Transportation on Flickr.

On 42nd Street, DDOT installed two mini-roundabouts a year ago to slow cars but keep the road working as a through route. Warren Street splits a block to the west and meets 42nd in two separate curved intersections where drivers take the turns too fast and often blindly.

American University agreed to pay for the traffic calming as part of negotiations over its most recent campus plan. That will fund more permanent versions, whose construction is scheduled to start on November 19.

Some neighbors say no

When the circles first appeared, some drivers complained of being confused. Sherry Cohen, a resident, said she thought the circles were dangerous.

The data, at least in Seattle, says otherwise: A 1997 study found that crashes dropped 94 percent in areas that got mini-circles. The city found that, "In addition to reducing [crashes], traffic circles have been effective at reducing vehicle speeds but have not significantly reduced traffic volumes."

Recently, Joan Silver, who lives right at the corner of 42nd and Warren, started circulating a petition opposing the permanent circles. She wants a new study to consider instead using stop signs or speed bumps.

Silver complains that the circles "do not satisfactorily or adequately address the range of traffic-related safety issues at the specified location, and ... have generated a number of dangerous conditions in their own right and negative impacts on properties immediately surrounding them."

Matthew Frumin, who chairs the area's Advisory Neighborhood Commission (3E), canvassed the neighborhood after receiving the complaints. In an email to the other commissioners and some of the petitioners, Frumin said that neighbors around the northern circle strongly favored making it permanent.

"While they do not think the circles are the only possible solution, they believe even the temporary northern circle has improved traffic conditions considerably," he wrote, "and that in the next phase when the circle takes its new shape and the crosswalk is added, conditions will improve further. If there is not a unanimous consensus around that, there is a very strong and decisive one in favor of the circle." Residents around the southern circle had more mixed views.

Comments on the petition say that the circles confuse some drivers (who even may go around the wrong way) or cause backups. Others complain that the pylons are ugly.

The permanent circles should address the aesthetic complaints. They will have landscaping that will create an attractive focal point for the residential neighborhood.

And fewer drivers will be "confused" as they get used to the circles. In other cities, drivers have not found them confusing or have adjusted. Perhaps a sign could help; some circles have them, though signs are also less attractive.

Trying new designs that have worked elsewhere should be the norm for our neighborhood streets. Hopefully DDOT will continue to experiment with ways to slow traffic down and make streets safer and more pleasant for everyone.

Greater Greater Washington relies on support from readers like you to keep the site running. Support us now keep the community going.

Support us: Monthly   Yearly   One time

Greatest supporter—$250/year
Greater supporter—$100/year
Great supporter—$50/year
Or pick your own amount: $/year
Greatest supporter—$250
Greater supporter—$100
Great supporter—$50
Supporter—$20
Or pick your own amount: $
Want to contribute by mail or another way? Instructions are here.
Contributions to Greater Greater Washington are not tax deductible.

Support Us