Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I'm sorry, but as someone who usually travels on foot or by transit I don't benefit when I'm forced to subsidize somebody else's driving.

Surely you'll agree that sleeping and eating are more fundamental human needs than driving. Yet we don't require an office building to contain bedrooms for all the people who work in the building. We don't require cafeterias - we allow a building's eating needs to be pushed out onto other buildings' restaurants. Why should cars be treated differently? If drivers are willing to pay the cost of providing parking, they should get parking, but they shouldn't be subsidized by non-drivers as they are now.

by Ben Ross on Jul 26, 2008 10:26 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam