Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Instituting this any time soon would needlessly stunt the system's growth.

Let's be clear, there's already a disincentive because it's hard to find a bike/spot at certain stations during rush hour.

We have lots of other options before we resort to new fees, which will discourage ridership. First, CaBi could be clearer in explaining that this is a system for occasional trips, not daily commuting, and that bikes often aren't available for commuter trips -- if that's your bag, buy a bike. In addition, system expansion and tinkering with station placement might relieve some crowding issues. Moreover, The reverse rider contest could expand into a permanent incentive, and CaBi could go further in trying to make it fun to rebalance the system, e.g. with occasional tweets highlighting stations that need rebalancing. And because some of the problem is just with specific stations, CaBi could do more to direct users to nearby stations with better availability. New charges should be the last resort for a fragile new system.

by Gavin on Jun 6, 2011 2:50 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam