Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

The problem was that your question said Evans "reimbursed" employees for the tickets; he did not reimburse them, he paid them with office funds. You've got several people here who have pointed out your errors on tax law, yet you've failed to acknowledge or respond to their specific references to IRS guides.

I've responded multiple times, but I'm happy to respond again.

First, when an employer reimburses a parking fine, that's taxable income. There are a couple IRS publications that state this clearly, but here is the one I linked to earlier. This publication lists deductions that you can make from your income on your 1040, like unreimbursed employee expenses. It then lists non-deductible expenses, and says this:

You cannot deduct fines or penalties you pay to a governmental unit for violating a law. This includes an amount paid in settlement of your actual or potential liability for a fine or penalty (civil or criminal). Fines or penalties include parking tickets, tax penalties, and penalties deducted from teachers' paychecks after an illegal strike.
Second, many commenters insist that if an employer pays for something on an employee's behalf instead of paying them directly, that that somehow gets around laws on taxable income. It doesn't, and if it did employers would be paying their employees rent and reducing their salaries accordingly.

Third, many commenters insist that if an employer pays them from an account other than their employer's checking account, that somehow that gets around laws on taxable income. It doesn't.

by Ken Archer on Aug 25, 2011 11:21 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam