Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I wish the survey had included a page for general comments - how else are we supposed to point out typos like the misspelling of Wiehle Avenue as "Weihle"?

Would a better implementation of subtitles be basing their use on how close a supplemental place is to the stop? One clear example is Vienna. It may be the closest station to Fairfax and the main campus of GMU, but it's certainly not walking distance to either location.

If a supplemental place is close enough to a stop to be within reasonable walking distance, should it be part of the main station name? If the supplemental place is far enough away that you're taking another form of transit to get there (e.g., the buses to Fairfax and GMU from Vienna), then should the supplemental place should be bumped down to a subtitle, or removed altogether and given a bus symbol like occurs on the current map for the 5A and B30 buses to the airports?

Of course, if you get too overzealous with marking up the rail map with bus symbols (e.g., if they started adding bus markers for the termini of the Circulator routes), it could make the map too difficult to read or require changes more frequently than is practical.

Thoughts?

by Prinny on Sep 6, 2011 1:08 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam