Report a Comment

Andrew Meyer called me up today to clarify our previous conversation. First, he told me that he is not really the family spokesman on these matters, and he referred me to a family member to call for the official family position.

Mr. Meyer did say, however, that the Meyers oppose the trail being near their land for a variety of reasons. In addition to trespassing, he is concerned about the risk of bullets and is skeptical that the government would pay for the wall. He is also skeptical about whether a wall would really stop all trespassing. Moreover, he is concerned that on the PG side, M-NCPPC has done a poor job of keeping motorized vehicles off the trail, similar to what Matt pointed out above. He is extremely skeptical that even a fence or wall would be able to stop determined trespassers.

He also said that he did not think that my previous commentary on his father was fair, but he did not say why.

He said several other interesting things but I agreed that I would not report them unless authenticated by the family member.

by Jim T on Nov 3, 2011 1:54 pm • link • report