Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Ok David, stop making funnies with your disctinction between public and privately financed NIMBYISM. I don't expect those of you who often accuse others of being NIMBYS to ever think you (yourselves) are NIMBYS. It's my tired but true idea that "nothing's offensive until you're offended." But really though, now NIMBYISM is defined as whether public money is being used on a project?...Come on! :)

Also, following your reasoning, it will pretty much never be a case where a city can show the economic benefits of a "recreational activity." Pertaining to the city, I don't see much health benefit to a velodrome. The Verizon Center is for-profit (I think) and I'm sure Lerner and those received quite a bit of money from the city.

@Tim, But right now we have just the foot in the door practice facility that the Mayor has yet to really engage my community on.

I get that. From what I've seen, the mayor hasn't engaged anyone seriously on this issue. The "interest" seems sparked only by the media which was started by Alan and and WCPaper when they were "investigating" why and by what means did Gray go to Tampa. Other sources picked it up and we're still here.

by HogWash on Dec 7, 2011 11:48 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam