Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

"or how the site might have been designed differently had the city prioritized a less suburbanized project."

In the 1960s. You're not seriously suggesting a Clarendon would have been built there then, if only urban policy were smarter?

Anyway, thats water under the bridge. The question is not how the market might have developed it in 1965 - its whats possible in 2011 - in 2015 - and in 2030

by AWalkerInTheCity on Dec 15, 2011 1:50 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam