Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Sounds more like jealousy than an actual issue with the practice. You seem more concerned that a 'privileged few' are enjoying it. It boggles the imagination that, though you seem to regard it as a good idea, you'd like to see the current iteration sunset rather than expand.

That's the idea here isn't it? Recognize the value, then build upon it.

Instead, you seem focused on this huge savings those participating are enjoying and how you've been spending big dollars to support it. We all know that's a bogus sentiment, really, highlighted by your admission that the program be expanded. That’s my point all along. Why cancel something that has real value – build upon it.

by Anon on Jan 26, 2012 12:13 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam