Report a Comment

Tom, I hear what you're saying, but you're worried about step #3,956 when we're on step #4.

For one, adding that density will make Rockville a destination in its own right. The relationship is not linear - you'll likely see a substantial reverse commute develop.

Furthermore, many trips simply will not materialize. You'll get people living and working within the same area and walking, rather than riding Metro. Adding that kind of density makes all sorts of service retail, restaurants, and other amenities feasible. Not everyone will be going into DC, as there are substantial employment anchors along the Pike already.

Finally, such increased density and improved land use provides the base from which to actually improve the services offered. This is not a chicken or the egg kind of scenario - when you add that density, it's a lot easier to push for more alternatives.

In short, what you mention is a concern, but under no circumstances is it a reason to not move forward with these changes.

by Alex B. on Oct 20, 2008 4:25 pm • link • report