Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Way back in 2003, the Parking Task Force observed that limiting RPP permits to residents of RPP-zoned blocks was bad policy, "one of the major flaws in the system. . . . If one lives in the area with the generally restrictive parking conditions, but does not live on an RPP block, one cannot get a parking sticker and is effectively treated in the same way as a visitor or commuter." But good luck on getting the Council to change that policy.

Re Mount Pleasant's opting out of this residents-only system, not only was this going to be trouble for our neighborhood businesses, but the 50%-setaside was going to afflict blocks far from the commercial strip. This would be a completely gratuitous complication. And what does one do if only one side of a street has parking? Which half gets to be resident-only, which retains the two-hour visitor allowance?

This program promises to be a massive ticket trap for unwary visitors to a neighborhood. How many people from outside the area will realize that one side of the street has one parking rule, the other side, a different rule? This is already nabbing people parking in Columbia Heights, unaware that "Zone 1 only" means no two-hour allowance for nonresidents.

by Jack on Mar 8, 2012 9:56 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam