Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

@charlie

I don't think the Rosslyn project includes the substation; there is one next to it, but it part of the project. So I'd suspect your FAR ratio calculation may be off.

It's not my FAR calculation.

http://www.arlingtonva.us/departments/CPHD/planning/data_maps/development/page67024.aspx

601,790 total square feet
60,179 total site area

Ergo, an FAR of 10, exactly. Obviously, there is more to the 'site' definition than just the base of the tower. If you include the substation's air rights, that would get you to a site of about 60k sf.

by Alex B. on Mar 12, 2012 9:56 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam