Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Either stop constantly using Saint to refer to Wells or stop pretending that you are some paragon of "objectivity." The two things are not compatible.

I never thought I was here "pretending" to be objective. I do, however, consider myself as someone having the ability to read and decipher information. Anyone casual observer reading the article would easily believe the spin that the council proved their corruption by "voting down" amendments but not know that they also voted for the resulting bill.

I don't think you need to be objective in order to discern the veracity of the article. I shouldn't have to be a perpetual cheerleader for whatever's written here and even if I were, we all should strive to be judicious in how we deliver misinformation to the public.

Whether I'm objective should be irrelevant to that.

by HogWash on Mar 28, 2012 5:36 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam