Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I can pick up on Birdie's answer and finish the union question. There are several reasons they aren't included in the initiative.

First of all, unions, as a percentage give a relatively small amount in DC elections. Furthermore, Unions have not been utilizing the same loop holes that many corporate entities have to skirt campaign finance laws as they are written now (the most prominent example being Mr. Thompson's numerous LLCs). Generally they give in one lump sum to a candidate.

Unions also give through PACs, however this legislation would do nothing to prevent corporations from doing the same (for better or for worse).

The focus is trying to make the process more transparent.

As previous posters note, this actually brings us in-line with numerous other jurisdictions. It is important to note that in these jurisdictions, none have seen the emergence of anything resembling the SuperPACs we see post-Citizens United in the Presidential race.

I hope that helps address the question, Ward6voter.

by Kevin O'Connor on Mar 28, 2012 6:56 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam