Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

WRT "the private sector", um, for the "private sector" to do something like this there needs to be positive economic return.

If $250 per square foot (my rough estimate of the cost of the project based on the data above) is considered too high a price by the private sector, why isn't it too high a price for the public sector? The only reason for paying above market value for the space is if we think the public sector can develop it into something of significantly greater utility than the private sector. That may potentially be the case, but being the highest bidder on anything based on the belief that you will be able to wring out more synergies than anyone else, comes with a high degree of risk (and a certain amount of hubris).

by Falls Church on Mar 30, 2012 11:24 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam