Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Only in the rarest of cases are motorists asked to endure months-long closures like this. Why, then do DC's pedestrians have to deal with this every day?

That's a bit of hyperbole. Motorists are forced every day to deal with road closures, detours, obstructions, traffic from construction, etc. I don't own a car and even I know that.

Reality is that these projects you mentioned are all progressive, mixed-use sites that will ultimately provide huge benefit for pedestrians and other non-motorists in ways this city hasn't seen in many decades. Better enforcement would be optimal, but in most cases, pedestrians are giving up relatively little (an extra few seconds or minutes to their journey) in order to get a lot in return. And the city has to strike that balance of responsible enforcement and accomodation versus overburdening private businesses.

Re: photos. They can be pretty easily deconstructed.

On Bladensburg Rd, did the photographer stop and ask these people why they were walking in a median? Who's to say these people would not normally walk on medians regardless of whether construction is present? And why could they not simply walk an extra 25 feet to the other side of the street?

On 14th street NW, the woman is walking through former parking converted to a no-parking tow zone (an inconvenience to motorists, which the author conveniently ommitted) which is very unlikely to be a path for motorists. She is also buffered from the traffic on 14th street by the bike lane. At a glance, the risk to her personal safety seems very minor...and she doesn't appear too concerned, what with her iPod earbuds still in as she walks into the road. I wasn't there to ask her whether she felt safe... But the photographer was.

by Scoot on Apr 12, 2012 12:57 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam