Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Like most things, regulations are a complex topic and can't simply be evaluated using blanket ideological stances. That is, regulations are neither inherently good or bad. Rather carefully crafted, well thought out, and coordinated regulations are good and hastily scraped together regulations that are overly prescriptive for emerging technologies or practices (which would include pedicabs) are bad. Yes, there should be some form of regulation and DC has that covered with their own set of pedicab regulations. Adding another layer of uncoordinated regulation at the national level is entirely unnecessary and is an example of bad regulation.

Also, it would not be possible to sue DC or NPS for lack of pedicab seat belt laws just as it's not possible to sue New Hampshire for its lack of auto seat belt laws. Realistically, pedicab passengers aren't going to wear seat belts and holding the pedicab operator responsible is just an excuse to be able to fine and possibly arrest (and possibly taser) pedicab drivers. Same goes for exacting dimensions for reflective tape, an SMV emblem, and carrying the book of rules at all times (typical "show me your papers" govt overreach).

Itse also worth pointing out that NPS is requiring a $100 application fee for obtaining a pedicab license which is just another burden and cost on small businesses that don't make much money but have many positive externalities. Sure, we have $100M subsidies for corporate solar companies but we have to charge pedicabs $100 for little quantifiable benefit.

And I'll reiterate, DC already has pedicab regulations and there's no evidence indicating that pedicabs are over regulated (rather, all the evidence is that NPS is over zealous in enforcing existing rules).

by Falls Church on Apr 15, 2012 2:49 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam