Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

To muse off-the-cuff for a minute:

Perhaps the Height Act could wait until after the city (not just the core) reaches full build-out. Something that's great about the city is there's always a "next" neighborhood, and part of that is the Act. The study in the link showed that DC actually has about as much floor space as similarly sized cities, but it's spread out over a larger area (hence the "Oozing like batter" headline).

This fits better with the pro-Height-Act narrative than the anti-Height-Act narrative. It also means that, as DC grows in population, more neighborhoods will be subsumed by downtown. We're approaching the point where the DC-imposed limits need to be raised to the federal limit, but given the underutilized land around the city and in places like Prince George's, I think we could hold off on the federal limit for another decade at least.

The benefit would be a more European city in terms of development pattern. I'm not talking about the romantic low-lying character, I mean a more mixed-use pattern for the whole city, which takes pressure off transportation infrastructure by spreading out loads and promoting more walking.

by OctaviusIII on Apr 21, 2012 3:58 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam