Report a Comment

@Charlie

Elm trees dying certainly could be a good reason for the loss of so many trees but that still leaves the issue of why weren't they replaced?

I've seen it in several municipalities - it is far too easy for the arborists to have trees removed than it is to get a tree planted and then - most importantly - have it cared for for 2-3 years so it gets established.

The end result is that trees are removed but not replaced. If they are replaced, the sapling is usually dead within a year. Hence, a loss of canopy.

This is, in my opinion, part of the brilliance of Casey Trees. They don't just plant trees, they provide the minimal care the trees need (watering) until they get established. Survival rates increase dramatically with this minimal care.

by Quercia on May 10, 2012 10:25 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam