Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

It's odd that a low median size of parks would count against a city's rankings. Given a set amount of total acreage, are fewer and larger parks inherently more superior than a greater number of smaller parks? I suppose large contiguous area is good for animal habitat, but I can't think of any other reason to prefer larger parks in cities.

by Daniel on May 23, 2012 4:27 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam