Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

That second example isn't so bad.

This should all be addressed, a X said, with form-based codes. The problem in the first example isn't the fact that it is tall-- the problem is that it doesn't blend well with the form of the original building. If it were a two-story brick pop-up that fit cleanly onto the original house, I wouldn't have a complaint.

The thing is that the specifications should be clear, allowing an architect and contractor to draw up the plans for a pop-up using the guidelines in a "by right" manner, and get started on them.

The purpose of a review board should be to make sure the guidelines are being followed, not to offer their own architectural input or that of "the community."

by JustMe on May 25, 2012 11:34 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam