Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Actually, I think you could even cover "appropriate" expansions with a form based code in a manner that I would be happy with.

So MOR would be for the prevailing height. But administrative review could be done for additions that conform with FBC guidelines developed for each architectural style.

Plans that don't fully conform/don't conform would be kicked up to a review committee.

But this isn't about endless process, it's about adding review procedures to a system that is pretty f*ed up with inadequate regulations now.

by Richard Layman on May 25, 2012 1:31 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam