Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

@Gray "So, this is in keeping with the HPRB's mission because . . . historically, buildings were never constructed without an explicit justification for every floor?

This is excellent because, if you've followed this story long enough, you'd know that all along this whole 'razing the church and putting in a combined church/office building complex in its place' was spun as being for the church's bests interests. The church wanted a building that required less upkeep, the church wanted a building that was more welcoming, the church this, and the church that. The office building/church complex was portrayed as the means to a noble end. But with this one question, the truth got revealed in all its ugliness. The church space was just "taking up valuable office space". This razing of an architecturally noted, irreplaceable, and beautiful landmarked church was all for the benefit of 'valuable office space' ...

by Lance on May 27, 2012 6:09 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam