Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

@anon

There's no conflict between 'quiet retail' and 'active uses.' Any sort of hard goods retail would qualify as an active use in my book, whether that's selling clothes or widgets or groceries. Those aren't really inherently noisy things.

As much as I might disagree with the idea that a restaurant and patio would be a bad idea on that corner, I can at least understand the objections to it from the neighbors across the street. I don't think that should give them veto power over retail tenants, but I understand their angst about it.

So lots of retail could be there while achieving both goals of being active, yet being quiet.

There are other types of uses that would be quiet, but not that active - like a bank branch, or a doctor/dentist office, etc.

Likewise, is daycare really that quiet of a use? Kids are loud. Daycare involves lots of drop-offs at early hours.

I read the desire for quiet retail as 'we don't want late night restaurants next door.'

by Alex B. on May 30, 2012 2:39 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam