Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Something in me has to want the HPO and other preservation groups to take in environmental costs whether by statute or practice.

I live in a historically designated area in my apt. complex(in Arlington) . There is not a lot of bicyle parking and the one rack nearest me is always way beyond capacity. I asked the management about what it would take to install more bike racks and they said it has to go through a preservation review process, while they may just be stalling its still silly to think that bike racks aren't compatible with an area that was originally built in the 1930's. They had bicylces then. It's not as if the street signs on the road are from the 30's ton contribute.

All that to say, that the preservation offices should in some respect accept that things should be changed for environmental or a plethora of other reasons and ultimately it doesn't detract.

by X on May 31, 2012 11:36 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam