Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Well, again, design review is more pain than it is worth, but this is totally within the purview and intent of the historic district.

Maybe the broader question is: where are the solar panels with compatible design? If these panels had been available in 1900, they would have elaborate brackets and finishes that would relate them to the details on the walls. Look at what architects in that period did when the lightbulb was an insanely cool gizmo.

Where are the traditionalist architects who addressing and celebrating new technology? Surely there are some, but all we hear about is how we have to go back to building exactly like we did in the 1900s and abandon all philosophical and technological development since then. Anyone I should look at?

by Neil Flanagan on May 31, 2012 12:53 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam