Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

How big are each of these spaces you mentioned, John? Looking at BB+P's locations at 5th & K and in Hyattsville, they seem to need about 7,000 square feet on preferably one floor - or two, if necessary. None of these spaces in Anacostia seem to be that big, though I could be wrong. This might also be an opportunity to do a different or smaller concept that may be more well-suited to an emerging neighborhood with less traffic (foot or otherwise) than some of their other locations.

Which brings me to my main point: is Shallal really a "frontiersman" in redeveloping neighborhoods? None of the locations he's gone to were particularly bad at the time. The 14th & V location opened in 2005, five years after the apartments above the U Street Metro and the Whole Foods a few blocks away. Shirlington was well established as a mini-Clarendon before Busboys came there. And the Hyattsville branch is part of a larger planned community in a pretty stable suburban area. Neighboring University Park has a median income over $100k/year.

The "worst" location Shallal picked is probably 5th & K. It's still surrounded by parking lots and has a lingering problem with prostitution, but it's basically downtown, two blocks from the convention center, and surrounded by new high-end residential buildings.

I think Anacostia has a lot of potential and will probably see some new restaurants or bars started by enterprising folks in coming years. But I'm curious if Andy Shallal would really take a chance on it, given where Busboys + Poets has landed in the past.

by dan reed! on Jun 7, 2012 5:28 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam