Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

As I think about it, I'm actually surprised that the bulk of trips aren't on the other side of the line, namely because speed isn't CaBi's only advantage.

1. Cost - The marginal cost of CaBi is $0. Whereas riding transit costs more for each trip. So users should be willing to take a little bit longer to get where they're going because it will save them money.

2. Exercise - On average, people value exercise. That's why they invest resources like time and money into it. People should be willing to take a bit longer to get somewhere via CaBi because it frees up time for exercise.

But then again...

3. Presentation - working against this is that many people don't want windblown hair and sweat-soaked clothing based on their destination, so this might dissuade members from biking, event when the above factors would make it desirable.

4. The Blockbuster effect - In a group, taking CaBi might only work if everyone is a member and everyone wants to take the trip. It's possible that even considering all of the above factors, members choose transit to stay with friends.

Still I would expect 2 and especially 1 to far outweigh 3 and 4 and so for the bulk of trips to be above the line, not below it.

by David C on Jun 19, 2012 3:11 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam