Report a Comment

@goldfish

The were promising rehearsal space for the Shakespeare Theatre company; gone. They were going to provide room for the Tiger Woods foundation; gone.

My understanding is that both of those tenants backed out. They might have been providing that space at a discount, but it wasn't going to be free. The economy tanked, and they changed their minds. Perhaps that's something you should take up with STC or the TW Foundation then.

How to profit handsomely in redeveloping city-owned assets:

How is profit relevant?

What kind of house/apartment do you live in? I'll bet it was developed for a profit when originally built. This is the process of development. That's how it works.

Oh, and you conveniently left out the large provision of affordable housing.

by Alex B. on Jun 22, 2012 10:08 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam