Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

@Mike
What I find hilarious about your issue with "disclosure" is that as a huge for-profit evil land developer, shouldn't Leinberger want cheap publicly available parking for people who work/live in his developments? One would think that's what he wants so that developers can push parking responsibility off onto the public - see externalities.

And yet here he is arguing that parking is underpriced and we should charge more for it. Doesn't seem like nefarious developerspeak to me.

Also, your huffpost article's arguments are just wacky - height limit is good because liberals who want the city life live in Virginia? And DC should be happy it can't develop for more tax revenue because the feds might decide to reduce their PILOT? That's the best we can do?

by MLD on Jun 29, 2012 10:07 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam