Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

goldfish, yes it does. They're going to have vocational classes there.

And also, so what if they didn't. That's a statement of fact (that's actually not factual). It's not a reason to oppose it. What is the underlying reason why using surplus education land for transportation is unacceptable?

by David C on Jul 3, 2012 2:52 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam