Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I can understand why Living Social would want this deal. But can anyone on City Council describe the limiting principle here? In other words, why are we asking other for-profit companies to pay taxes, but not this one? Why should we expect citizens who work for the government or for non-profits to pay taxes, if Living Social doesn't have to?

by Tom Veil on Jul 5, 2012 3:18 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam