Report a Comment

goldfish,

I certainly wasn't trying to distort what you wrote. I was trying to understand it. That's why it was in the form of a question. I still don't understand what you're trying to say. The question I asked is "How much would you estimate it is worth - in dollars - to use the RFK lot instead of the school property?" and the only thing I saw that looked like an answer was "So assuming a 1-acre site, you could figure at least $1 million/year in lost opportunity real estate taxes." So if that isn't the answer, then what is?

Let me try to be explicit. We have two options:

A. Lawn by Spingarn and facility on RFK lots.

B. Facility by Springarn and RFK lots as they are now

How much more would you pay for A than B?

If the shed is sited on school grounds, then this property will not be used for what was intended for it, namely more school buildings.

Was that or is that the intention? Who intended that and how do you know that was the intention?

by David C on Jul 9, 2012 12:21 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam