Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

This article is soooooo misleading. The loss of revenue isn't because of services the city is providing to the feds and private interests -- it's because they pay no property taxes. The more private institutions allowed to establish in the city, the more property tax revenue lost.

Private institutions and the Federal Government do not get services provided by the District. If Archer is talking about roads -- the feds might have difficulty with that assertion since the FTA sinks considerable funding into our infrastructure. The NPS also sinks beaucoup bucks here every year. Surely Archer doesn't think the city is doing all this on its own dime.

[Deleted for violating the comment policy.]

by Karl on Jul 29, 2012 11:17 am • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam