Report a Comment

How and why is never explained.

It absolutely is.

1. Evans was the only one who spoke against the bill.
2. Evans voted against the bill.
3. Evans' staff were reportedly encouraging other members to vote no

So those are the reasons. Evans was against it, and he actively tried to persuade others to vote against it. Even if you want to discount item 3 because it comes from an unnamed source, item 1 still establishes that Evans was trying to encourage others to vote against it. Only Evans did this. This was the "move" named in the title.

That makes the title pretty accurate in my opinion. Which statement do you see as inaccurate?

by David C on Jul 31, 2012 2:00 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam