Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

"When it's possible to make a buck by 'unbundling' parking, businesses do that."

I don't think you understand the purpose of bundling. The purpose of bundling is to provide more than a customer wants. See, for example, your cable/satellite TV bill.

"Government policies that distort parking is one thing, prohibiting free-market approaches such as bundling or subleasing spaces is another."

Bundling isn't a free-market approach. Forcing a person to buy something he doesn't want to is the opposite of a free-market.

"One would think that the folks paying a hefty premium to live literally on top of the metro would be the first ones to go without vehicles, but it isn't the case."

When I lived in a complex 1/4 mile from the White Flint station, I didn't sell my car. But I was far less likely to use it for my daily commute. The DC area is very difficult to navigate without a car, even if you can commute without one. If you want to go shopping, you need a car. If you want to socialize, you need a car. But it would still be a benefit to the traffic situation as a whole if more people were commuting by Metro.

by RickD on Oct 23, 2012 1:07 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam