Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

@oboe, if you don't like the get-what-you-pay-for argument, consider it as a straight analogy to the bag fee, where after people had time to adjust, the revenue did not meet projections. As soon as people either slow down (and get fewer tickets) or get better radar detectors, the tax revenues will go down. So it falls on the taxpayers regardless.

by goldfish on Nov 19, 2012 9:07 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam
Support Us

How can our region be greater?

DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
CC BY-NC