Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

This is kind hair-splitting but I'll play along.

In the context of blogs like this one, "affordable housing" is almost always shorthand for government polices such as subsidies and de facto rent control.

It's not hair-splitting, it is about defining the very thing we are discussing.

I disagree with your characterization that these discussions "almost always" turn on subsidies. That's neither here nor there, however. Part of the problem is that the term 'affordable housing' has been construed so broadly as to have little meaning. Are we talking about a subsidy program, or just what the market will bear? What kind of timeframe are we looking at? Etc.

I actually think some of your policy ideas you've thrown out are intriguing and worthy of discussion. It's your charge about cognitive dissonance that I take issue with. It's not that hard to find cognitive dissonance if you use terms and definitions that are so fuzzy as to make dissonance avoidance impossible.

by Alex B. on Dec 10, 2012 11:27 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam