Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

"when there's so much room to grow, if the government decides to focus on these less glamerous neighborhoods."

I think the OP was quite supportive of expanding options in less glamorous nabes. But since lower income folks cannot pay rents that will drive market rate development in such places, adding more housing in those places means either A. Direct govt investment/subsidy or B. Making those places desirable to residents with choice - which means adding transit AND amenities.

by AWalkerInTheCity on Dec 19, 2012 1:34 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

Which rules in the comment policy do you believe the comment violates?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment is name-calling or berates, belittles, or interrogates others.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Comment is getting into an aggressive argument with another.
Comment is trolling.
Comment is off topic.
Commenter is impersonating someone else or switching handles.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.

Enter any other information you think would be helpful to us:

Your name:
Your email:

To be sure you're not a spammer, please use the map below to answer this question:
If you are at the Wheaton Metrorail station and head outbound on the Red Line, what is the next station you will reach?   

This map contains the answer to the challenge question.
Click to see the larger map. Feel free to ignore station subtitles.
Administrator pagespam