Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

A point not mentoned in the article is the $120 million or so project to shorten the existing bridge soley for aesthetics regarding that stadium that the DC city council was arm-twisted into approvng in March 2005. Such a project, so few years before the SCS Bridge replacement was a waste, which the Nationals should have been billed for the cost.

http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com/2008/02/south-capitol-street-eis-released-may.html

http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com/2006/06/reported-as-footnote-with-no-mention.html

http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com/2006/06/47-118-million-interim-project.html

by Douglas Andrew Willinger on Jan 2, 2013 3:31 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam
Support Us

How can our region be greater?

DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
CC BY-NC