Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment


Instead we got that stadium that would block options B and C in that 2003 study- which were the two options consistent with the often stated goal of a SCS Gateway linear park.

Instead we are stuck with a variation of option A which was the one that did NOT widen the SCS corridor, but consistent with the preferences of the PTB for that stadium alonng with not moving the St Vincent DePaul Roman Catholic Church, now backed up by Nats owner Lerner's recent construction.

The real plan of course was Extending the Legacy, which is the topic of my South Capitol Street blog.

Exceptionally inexcusible was the abandoning of the proposed greenway at least to the west, where new construction has foolishly been allowed to proceed.

http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com/2011/06/demolition-special-breaks-ground-on.html

http://wwwsouthcapitolstreet.blogspot.com/2008/08/western-portion-of-south-capitol-mall_02.html

by Douglas Andrew Willinger on Jan 2, 2013 9:46 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam