The Washington, DC region is great >> and it can be greater.

Report a Comment

To build on CityGal's many fine points, if the city is really heading towards greater livability through pedestrianization, this seems like an abdication of a great opportunity. The oval and circle seem like fine ideas, but the scale is way off as previously noted, and with the circa 1965 highway ramps on to 295, they will all but destroy this area's potential to be an extension of the pedestrian environment being created around the ball park into Anacostia. If we're planning to accomodate another million residents, let's redesign areas that could accept some of them when we need to re-build infrastructure.

Annacostia Park seems like a great opportunity for re-development considering it's the connective tissue between the ball park area and both Annacostia and Berry Farm. With the Naval Support Facility hogging prime costal realestate to the south, it would be nice to see the city embrace one of its most underused asset, it's miles of waterfront. Why not extend the area that South Capitol is becoming de-highwayized accross the river? This would not only tie East of the river to West but considering the density we are supposed to handle in the near future, we need to envision large chunks of land to accomodate future development. Where's the big picture vision of the city, where are the McMillan styled drawings that paint a picture of what a sophisticated city could be, and not leave another infrastructure project to the narrow domain of the traffic engineer?

by Thayer-D on Jan 3, 2013 6:03 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

Which rules in the comment policy do you believe the comment violates?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment is name-calling or berates, belittles, or interrogates others.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Comment is getting into an aggressive argument with another.
Comment is trolling.
Comment is off topic.
Commenter is impersonating someone else or switching handles.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.

Enter any other information you think would be helpful to us:

Your name:
Your email:

Sorry, your computer has been blocked due to suspicious activity. If this is an error, we welcome having you comment; please contact us using the email address in the upper right and we will re-enable your comment ability right away. Thanks!
Administrator pagespam
Support Us