Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

@MLD Not every chart has to outline exactly how every number was derived.

Depends on how extraordinary the claims are, and if otherwise the data might be misinterpreted. Fail on both in this instance.

All that was necessary here was another row showing the number of residents of institutions that were to be subtracted from the total population.

Regarding snark: you are correct, that was over the top, and I am sorry for that.

by goldfish on Jan 4, 2013 10:46 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

Which rules in the comment policy do you believe the comment violates?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment is name-calling or berates, belittles, or interrogates others.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Comment is getting into an aggressive argument with another.
Comment is trolling.
Comment is off topic.
Commenter is impersonating someone else or switching handles.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.

Enter any other information you think would be helpful to us:

Your name:
Your email:

Sorry, your computer has been blocked due to suspicious activity. If this is an error, we welcome having you comment; please contact us using the email address in the upper right and we will re-enable your comment ability right away. Thanks!
Administrator pagespam
Support Us