Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Another element is to charge alternative fuel vehicles $100 per year. McDonnell's argument is that since these use less gas, they should contribute to the costs of road maintenance. But it's particularly ironic that he's looking to have these vehicles pay for road maintenance while exempting regular gas-guzzlers.

Wait . . . what? AFVs use less gas, so they have to pay a $100 fee for road maintenance, presumably to make up the difference for the gas taxes the state is not collecting.

But the gas tax is eliminated.

So in addition to paying the same higher sales taxes as everyone else, AFV owners must pay $100 per year for road maintenance, while all others need pay nothing extra towards road maintenance. Hybrid/electric car owners are penalized with an extra fee for making an environmentally responsible choice.

This isn't ironic, it's Alice through the looking glass insanity.

by dcd on Jan 9, 2013 11:50 am • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam