Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

I think this is an important issue and am glad the Post and GGW are covering it.

It _is_ significant. Mid-year transferring is always a net negative, because a lot of education is connected to relationships and classroom (aka "community") norms, which take time to develop and internalize.

But it's even more problematic when the transfer is a result of a student being disruptive or having other negative effects on their classroom. Under the current system, charter schools have the ability to kick out or coerce out the students that they perceive as least desirable. Neighborhood schools do not have this ability... plus, they must take the mid-year transfers from the charters. I would think that this is obviously, clearly unfair, and needs to be addressed.

(Adding insult to injury, they charter schools get to keep the per-student financial allotment of the kids they kick out, and the neighborhood schools don't get any extra funds for taking them on, as long as the transfer occurs after October. Of course, moving the kids would still be unfair if the money moved with them, but this just underscores the perverse incentives for charter schools to abuse their extra privileges.)

by Tim H on Feb 12, 2013 1:09 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam