Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

"Part of the problem is that those who are opposed to the proposal to remove parking minimums equate it with removing parking."

No, it should be equated with transfering private costs (i.e., a developer's cost to provide at least some off-street parking) to the public sphere, when more and more vehicles are parked on already overcrowded public streets.

If OP were serious about eliminating parking minimums, they would have the new rule apply only near Metro stops, not along bus corridors where the service remains erratic and unreliable. (Just ask the Glover Park ANC commissioners who don't want to give up ward-wide RPP because they think the 30s bus line service sucks.) OP ought to follow Arlington's policy and exclude no-parking developments from street parking permit status, to prevent the aforementioned shifting of costs and to encourage transit use.

Otherwise, it's just a smoke screen to increase developer margins on new projects at the expense of the general public.

by JasperJ on Feb 14, 2013 3:29 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam
Support Us

How can our region be greater?

DC Maryland Virginia Arlington Alexandria Montgomery Prince George's Fairfax Charles Prince William Loudoun Howard Anne Arundel Frederick Tysons Corner Baltimore Falls Church Fairfax City
CC BY-NC