Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

No, it should be equated with transfering private costs (i.e., a developer's cost to provide at least some off-street parking) to the public sphere,

Except, if you mandate parking, those are not private costs.

And they are not private costs anyway, since those costs merely get passed on to the rest of us through higher prices.

The public pays for all this parking one way or another. The question is if we want the users of that parking to pay more in line with the share they use, or if we continue to overbuild and push the costs of doing so on the rest of our citizens.

by Alex B. on Feb 14, 2013 3:59 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam
Support Us