Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

nathaniel, while I don't want to defend the wack jobs in Brookland, regardless of what you or I think about the Col. Brooks project, the fact of the matter is that it abuts against rowhouses and detached dwellings on the same block. I am not speaking about the merits of the case, just the reality of proximity and abutting.

Same goes with the project on U St. While I agree with David's post, you can see why people living across the alley, mostly in 2 story rowhouses, might have some concern about taller buildings.

Most of the projects in commercial districts do in fact abut some residential. But mostly, the general arguments from the neighborhood residents tend to reflexively argue against height, density, change, etc.

OTOH, you can argue that people shouldn't have chosen to live in abutting properties if they weren't prepared for the possibility of change. (I had those arguments with people in Brookland when I was the Main Street Manager then.)

by Richard Layman on Feb 27, 2013 1:09 pm • linkreport

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator pagespam