Greater Greater Washington

Report a Comment

Trulee Pist:

If you twisted my arm, I'd say the latter. But I pick both. One does not catch drivers who drive excessively in fuel efficient cars, and one, IMHO, is unfair to drivers of ultra efficient vehicles. I think some combination of the two is preferable, but the latter choice would probably encourage better land use policies in the long run vice the proliferation of more efficient vehicles in the short to mid term. The proliferation of these vehicles, btw, sounds like an implicit subsidy to the auto industry.

by JTS on Jun 17, 2009 11:39 pm • link • report

Does this comment violate Greater Greater Washington's comment policy? If so, you can report it using this form and an editor will take a look.

What is the major reason you believe the comment violates the policy?
Comment is spam.
Comment attacks other individuals personally.
Comment criticizes the level of knowledge of another commenter or contributor.
Comment discourages others from posting their ideas.
Commenter is impersonating someone else.
Comment uses profanity or abusive language.
Comment advocates violent acts or harm to another.
Comment was posted in multiple areas of the site.
Comment is arguing about the comment policy.
Other:

Your name:
Your email:

Administrator page • spam